Skip to main content
Journal Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Journal magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Journal Magazine on Instagram
  • Visit Journal Magazine on Twitter
  • Visit @Journal_Mag on Facebook
Visit the website of the Chartered Insurance Institute Logo of the Chartered Insurance Institute

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
  • News analysis
  • Features
  • Study Room
    • A-Z
    • Question and Answer (Q&A)
    • Study Room Features
  • Opinion
  • CII Radio
  • Events
  • Digital Magazine
    • The Asia-Pacific Journal
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Journal Issues
  • April/May 2021
Study Room

Setting the standard

Share on
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print
Open-access content Wednesday 5th May 2021
Authors
Amelie Smith
web_p41_setting-the-standard1_Istock-1221389766.png

Amelie Smith explains how the CII helps to build trust in the profession by holding its members to account if they breach the Institute’s Code of Ethics

Members of the CII and candidates who take CII examinations agree to be bound by the laws of the Institute and may be subject to disciplinary proceedings for breach of the laws. 

Where an individual is alleged to have failed to conduct themselves in accordance with the laws, the CII has a duty to act and will initiate an investigation. The overriding objective is public trust, which is a multi-faceted subject, but one of its key components is the ability of the CII to take action against members whose conduct has fallen short of the expected standards set out in the laws. The guiding document is the Code of Ethics, which describes the behaviour expected of our members and which our members agree to be bound by.

One way in which the CII upholds its and your reputation both internally and externally is via its disciplinary process, which enables members, candidates and the public to make complaints about actual or perceived misconduct. The outcome of such complaints leading to a sanction being imposed is published on the CII’s website and in The Journal. 

Disciplinary cases range from plagiarism (either deliberate or unwitting) or breach of an examination’s published rules by an examination candidate, to financial mismanagement by a member, a member being convicted of a crime (no matter how ‘trivial’), disreputable conduct by a member, misuse of intellectual property by a member and a member being the subject of a statutory finding by a regulator such as the Financial Conduct Authority, the Pensions Regulator, or the Information Commissioner’s Office in the UK and equivalent bodies in other jurisdictions.

Securing public trust

As the CII’s Charter states, it is about securing the confidence of the public and employers in the CII’s membership. In practical terms, this means that the public can identify via our website those members who have committed a breach of some kind. There is a demonstrable deterrent, and the general public is able to have confidence that the CII brand stands for ethical conduct by reputable members of the CII.

There are many benefits of a disciplinary process to members such as: confidence that any instances of unethical behaviour causing damage to the reputation of their profession will be properly addressed; there is a publicised deterrent available. The membership as a whole cannot be held accountable for the misconduct of a few individuals. The profession remains attractive to future members as an ethical career and there is an assurance that CII members’ conduct is directly connected to creating and ensuring public trust.

Regulators and employers of CII members can likewise rest assured that the CII takes misconduct with due seriousness and they may place their reliance on the CII’s willingness to align its members’ ethical obligations with their legal and regulatory needs. The CII’s focus is on public trust and it has no other contradictory agenda. Moreover, the outcome of the disciplinary process is freely available for inspection on our website. The laws of the Institute and the manner in which they are upheld are transparent and easily accessible.

The CII’s members will surely agree that the reputation of the profession is greater than that of an individual; and being able to rely on the CII upholding the laws of the Institute without fear or favour is part of the price of membership. 

Amelie Smith is a barrister and legal manager of in-house counsel at the CII

Image Credit | iStock
Journal April_May 2021.jpg
This article appeared in our April/May 2021 issue of The Journal.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
Study Room
Topics:
Professional Standards

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

BECOME A MEMBER

BECOME A MEMBER

SUBSCRIBE TO PRINT

SUBSCRIBE TO PRINT
The-Journal_NEW.png
​
FOLLOW US
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
CONTACT US
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7880 6200
Email
Advertise with us
​

About the CII

About us
Membership
Qualifications
Events

The Journal

Digital magazine
Podcasts
Blog
News

General Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Write for The Journal
Want to receive The Journal?

© 2022 • The Journal Magazine is published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ